I have been asked my opinion on the necessity of keeping 30
rounds magazines for guns. To quote some
comments: “The only reason for 30 round mag is to kill people – why should the
government allow those?” “What possible
sporting use is a 30 round mag?” And so
it goes that it would appear to the average person that there is really no
necessity for these large capacity mags, except to kill people.
So it is time to get down to the cold hard unpleasant facts
that no one really wants to think about or consider. The true purpose of the Second Amendment is not to preserve sporting purposes, or to make a better target shooter, or to
hunt much of anything in the wild kingdom.
The true purpose is as check on, as last resort against, a government
that has gone completely outside its boundaries.
In the last century, which is through the 1900s, there were
untold millions of people killed. We
call these mass murders. Did they happen
at schools and malls and post offices by lone individuals? No, they were committed against people disarmed
by their own governments for all kinds of reasons such as: religious beliefs, or one so called superior
race attacks and murders by the millions an “inferior” race, and communists
against the free people. According to
the Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership around 80 million people
were murdered by their own governments in the last century alone.
Our Founders noted the same phenomenon of oppressive
governments in their writings therefore they made arrangements to prevent
government from taking the most fundamental of rights away from the
People. These rights are secured in the
Bill of Rights. Governments strive to:
shut people up, control the press, prevent gatherings of protesting citizens,
control religion, especially Christianity, break into the homes of the People
without warrants, and you can go right down the list in the bill of
rights. I don’t have space to discuss
each one of these and how these rights are being infringed in today’s society
by US and state governments, but it doesn’t take much research to find it to be
true.
There is one right and one alone that gives the People a
final chance to right the wrongs of a government out of control. That right is the Second Amendment, which
secures the rifle in the hands of a People who have taken the last abuse they
are willing to take. A saying that I
have oft repeated is that those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat
it. Maybe I am a dreamer but I think
that government is going to run out of enforcers if they push much
farther. I have talked to so many police
officers that have stated to me in person that they will NOT participate in the
disarming of the People.
So back to 30 round mags – they give people some extra
defensive capability against forces which they might not otherwise have. That covers one politically incorrect reason,
now some other reasons. 1. Dealing with multiple assailants. 2. Citizens
facing threats before police arrive.
3. Civil disturbances. 4. Confrontation
by an armed criminal with multiple weapons.
I can hear it now, “But Dr. Mefford, just what is the
likelihood of these scenarios happening?”
My answer is, “not very likely.”
However it isn’t too likely that my house will catch fire, or have a
tornado blow it down, or well you can name it, but I carry insurance
anyway. No I don’t live in daily fear
for my life; however I do live in fear that my fundamental God given rights are
being usurped and encroached daily by Chicago and Washington DC politicians in
fancy pants with fancy words. I study
history and we cannot escape a repeat without resistance in which the People
stand firmly on their rights. The
classic tactic is registration of firearms and owners, which is followed by
confiscation.
In Illinois owners are already unconstitutionally
registered. Now proposals are to
register and ban certain politically incorrect arms. It is time to refuse no matter what unconstitutional
laws are passed. You don’t need to be a judge
to understand the phrase “shall not be infringed.”
My favorite argument is that, as law-abiding citizens, the liberals must prove that we should NOT own them, not the other way around. Completely different way of attacking the argument. - Dan M.
ReplyDeleteif i have only a ten round mag. and a criminal breaks into my home with a 30 round mag. i am a dead man enough said!
ReplyDeleteI'm a veteran of the United States Air Force. My oath was to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against both foreign and domestic. While I have been out of the military for sometime now, that oath never leaves a military person. Whatever I have to do, I will!!! I have a wife and 4 kids but I absolutely do not want them living under a dictatorship. If I have to die to protect the 2nd Admendment then so be it. I hope it doesnt get to that point but I sincerely believe that there is an "uprising" brewing.
ReplyDeleteDear Veteran, Thanks so much for your service. Unfortunately, in my opinion, your service is not done. You have joined the elite group who have been trained and now are tasked with watching and holding fast against the tide the Thieves of Liberty that are at work in our day. They have always been at work, but are gaining ground like never before in the history of our country.
DeleteThese Thieves of Liberty, reside in our seats of justice, in the halls of Congress, and especially in the state house in Illinois. In Illinois they are part of the Chicago Machine. Continue to quietly but firmly hold fast and just say, "I WILL NOT COMPLY" with these unconstitutional edicts.
We must stand fast that our children may have Liberty!
Regards, Dr. Dan
@anonymous #2 if a criminal breaks into your home with a 30 round magazine and you only have ten you are only a dead man if you miss with your first ten shots. Maybe you should work on your aim as opposed to advocating the removal of your right to do so.
ReplyDelete