Showing posts with label FOID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FOID. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

30 Round Mags...



I have been asked my opinion on the necessity of keeping 30 rounds magazines for guns.  To quote some comments: “The only reason for 30 round mag is to kill people – why should the government allow those?”  “What possible sporting use is a 30 round mag?”  And so it goes that it would appear to the average person that there is really no necessity for these large capacity mags, except to kill people.

So it is time to get down to the cold hard unpleasant facts that no one really wants to think about or consider.  The true purpose of the Second Amendment is not to preserve sporting purposes, or to make a better target shooter, or to hunt much of anything in the wild kingdom.  The true purpose is as check on, as last resort against, a government that has gone completely outside its boundaries. 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The Might of the State Does Not Make Right



In a truly free country, such as ours has been, the government gains its power from the consent of the governed.  The governed is We the People.  When the People have made it clear that there are laws that get no respect from the People and further they are unconstitutional then it is time for the law to go.  In the case of Illinois we have a number of those laws, especially the gun laws. 

Now there are several ways to make these laws go away, or at least have their effect neutralized.  Let’s take a look at some of the ways.  They can be repealed by the legislature.  That isn’t going to happen anytime soon because the Chicago Machine rules with no consideration for the Constitution.  Another way is for State’s Attorneys and law enforcement officials to refuse to enforce unconstitutional law.  A third way is for sitting juries to refuse to convict when in their opinion they feel the law is not good.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Take a Stand!


Amazing!  There are some individuals in government who will take a stand from time to time.  It takes a tremendous amount of courage to stand in the face the status quo and choose to say, “I will not enforce unconstitutional law against otherwise law abiding citizens.”  This is what State’sAttorneys (SA) Ron Dozier from McLean County, and Mike Valentine,Edwards, County, Illinois, have chosen to do (Press Release).  
Dozier clearly stated that,
"Every SA is expected to prosecute persons who violate the criminal laws of the State of Illinois within his or her jurisdiction. However, there are literally thousands of criminal laws on the books, ranging in seriousness from extremely minor to extremely serious. Because of both budgetary and time limits, every SA must set priorities on which cases to prosecute and which to not prosecute. The pursuit of a just result and the wise use of taxpayer dollars are major factors in setting those priorities."
He also quoted: 
“The duty of a public prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict.” [Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8. See also Berger v. U.S., 295 U.S. 78, 55 S.C. 629, U.S. Supreme Court, 1935]
and,
“The SA is not merely a ministerial officer but is vested with a large measure of discretion. In the exercise of that discretion, he has the responsibility of determining what offense should be charged.” [Marcisz v. Marcisz, 65 Ill.2d 206, Illinois Supreme Court, 1976]

The Chicago Machine continues to stick its finger in the face of the Supreme Court and continues to rule Illinois with an Iron Fist against the wishes and rights of most Illinoisans.  The elected State officials have the choice as to whether they are going to enforce these blatantly unconstitutional laws.  Mr. Dozier's comment was, "So far, the City of Chicago and the State have done everything possible to defy, obfuscate and ignore the Court’s substantive rulings."

As I have quoted many times, "... the right of the People to Keep and Bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."  Need any more be said than that?  It is time to confront present office holders and those running for office and ask them, “what part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED do you not understand?  Are you going to support these words on their face as intended by the Founders, and as made clear by the highest court in the land?”

Mr. Dozier also implied that cases will always require specific review on a case by case basis, but that otherwise law abiding citizens will not be prosecuted.  Another statement that is particularly poignant, "We are the only State to have a draconian FOID law that makes criminals out of ordinary citizens who have done nothing wrong except exercise their constitutional right to own a gun."

Dozier goes on to make it clear that, "Our message is this: we will no longer use the power and authority of our office to criminalize and punish decent, otherwise law-abiding citizens who choose to exercise the rights granted to them by the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and their families." [Emphasis in original]
He encourages other SAs to join with him in returning our state to founding principles.  I personally applaud his effort.  It is time that We the People remove ‘offending’ (nice term) SAs across this state from their offices and replace them with people who realize their oath of office is to first and foremost, to uphold the constitutions of the United States and Illinois and to provide a frame work for justice, not just convictions.

These men and women and can help to bring justice to Illinois by neutering the Chicago Machine as they try to rule from their high rise ivory towers.  One article stated that Chicago, even with its draconian gun laws, now has the dubious distinction of being the “Murder Capital” of the world.  The Huffington Post had a recent article claiming that Chicago homicides outnumber troop killings in Afghanistan.  All these numerous gun laws have done is cause the law abiding citizen to be helpless sheep with the wolves preying on the flock.  The nice thing about it, if you are a ruler you can take training and carry.  The rulers definitely have it figured out!

So my solution is to ask the not so hard questions;
  1. Will you join with other SAs and not prosecute otherwise law abiding citizens for gun laws which defy the constitution, such as FOID and carrying in public?
  2. Will you go on record with your answers?
That shouldn’t take too much courage, after all someone else is already leading the way, all the other SAs have to do is get on board the train and win by sheer numbers.  That does not stop them from evaluating on a case by case basis, but at least it shows you will take a stand and that your heart is in the right place.

If you would like to correspond with me on this contact me at: editorial@pike912.org or leave a message at 217-285-2134, or follow my blog at: pike912.blogspot.com.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

A Matter of Presumption…

The Legislators of the State of Illinois have made two (2) presumptions, at least when it comes to the Firearms Owners ID card (FOID). 
Presumption:
  1. All Illinois Citizens are untrustworthy.
  2. All other Americans are trustworthy.
The State, or in reality, the Chicago Machine, in my opinion, has presumed that if you reside in Illinois you are so untrustworthy that to increase public safety you must be vetted and approved by the State to bear an arm or to buy ammunition or armament.
The State has further presumed that if you are an American who resides outside the borders of the State of Illinois, then you are a perfectly honorable upstanding Citizen and need no vetting process to determine if you are upstanding enough to carry an arm, or purchase an arm or ammunition.  It is enough that you are NOT an  Illinois Citizen.
Senator Sam McCann has proposed a law to repeal the FOID card SB3340 – he needs others sponsors to help carry this repeal process forward.  I would encourage the People to call their Senators ASAP to request that they get on board as cosponsors of this.  This is your opportunity to ask them why they DIS-trust the People of Illinois, but TRUST all Americans from other states and territories.
A similar proposal is in the Illinois House of Representatives, so while you are calling your legislators, call your Illinois Representative and discuss your concerns about this with them.
All have my express permission to spread this far and wide.  If you would like to use it and send to your own newspaper, as a Letter to the Editor, over your own name you have my express permission to do so.  Just get it out there and get the pressure going!
I may be contacted at: carry@pike912.org, for further discussion.
Dan A. Mefford, D.C.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Conceal Carry Now ? How 'bout Constitutional Carry Now!

In 1995 my business was the subject of a burglary.  At that time I wrote a letter praising the local city and county police in solving that crime.  I continue to stand by that letter.  I also made the following remark:

“It is encouraging to see the ‘system’ work as it is supposed to.  Many times it is easy to say “where are the police when you need them?”  However they cannot be everywhere at once.  We would not want them everywhere at once.  After all who needs a police state?  Not I!”

Fourteen years have passed and we have more police than ever and are closer to a police state than we have ever been.  The police still cannot be everywhere, thank God.  However our rulers, Chicago Machine, say the common people, citizens of Illinois, cannot be trusted to own a firearm without their blessing via the FOID card.  I say that is garbage.  It is time that the people realized that our rulers wish to keep the people disarmed because the rulers are afraid of an armed citizenry, not concerned about “the children.”

In the name of ‘safety for the children’ and a plethora of other so called necessities, I, a citizen of Illinois in good standing, must crawl to the rulers to ask for permission to own and carry a gun in Illinois.  At the same time the police cannot be everywhere to “protect and serve.”  Many police are my friends, but I don’t want them everywhere.  The rulers have made it increasingly clear that keeping the peace is now secondary to being “Law Enforcers,” carrying out the edicts of the rulers.  Really important laws like, seat belt laws, have actually become an excuse to stop and check for other violations, and generate revenue.  Many police don’t feel good about it, but they are just doing their job.  If they don’t do it they will be hunting a new job.

Many Illinois citizens are now begging that the rulers let us carry concealed firearms.  The truth is the people have a God given fundamental right to carry guns.  Now it is important to understand that the term ‘fundamental right,’ or ‘inalienable right,’ is a right that you are born with.  A fundamental right is NOT granted by any so-called law making body or any constitution.  The constitution secures and guarantees and recognizes these inalienable rights, the constitution does not grant any rights whatsoever.  Therefore a fundamental right cannot be taken away by any law making body accept at the risk of the wrath of the people (some would say sheeple).

These rights should not be confused with “civil rights.”  Civil rights are rights, supposedly granted by the government.  An example would be something like the “right to an education.”  Nobody is born with a right to an education.  Another might be a “right to a minimal income.”  Nobody is born with a right to be supported by others.  Any civil right can be taken away.  I always enjoyed my old colleague Illinois Senator John Davidson when he would breathe fire and yell at the rest of his fellow chiropractors, what the government giveth the government can take away.”  He would follow it by a speech to support financially those legislators who supported our cause.  Then he would say at the top of his voice into a microphone, “money is the mother’s milk of politics and don’t you ever forget it!”  My point is, the right to keep and bear arms is NOT a civil right that can be voted away and don’t you ever forget it!

For example there is no dispute that the people have a right to freedom of speech un-infringed by laws made by some ruling government body.  The individual has the right to exercise this freedom up to the point at which it infringes on some other individual’s right to enjoyment of life and liberty.  The old classic is that you are free to talk about someone as long as it is the truth, even if it might not be in good taste.  If you begin to lie about, defame and libel someone then you have crossed the natural limit to the exercising of that fundamental right to freedom of speech.  All rights have a natural boundary that the honest, moral, and reasonable person can recognize without the assistance of government.  No one would dispute that if the government were to pass a freedom of speech license that it would not be right or constitutional.  In other words you would be able to express yourself as long as you purchased a “speakers license.”  Then you could speak as much as you want, at least as long as your speech was, of course, “politically correct.”  Well you can see that obviously the government has taken a fundamental right to free speech and converted it into a privilege and is now charging a tax (license fee) for it.

Now let’s apply this to the firearm issue that is currently a hot topic among many in this state and in our country as whole.  I, as member of the human race, have been born with the right to “keep and bear arms,” as have all other humans.  Remember, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men… are endowed… with certain inalienable rights….”  The right to keep and bear arms cannot be voted away by an act of congress or an act of the Chicago Machine House of Rulers.  This is recently affirmed in the Heller US Supreme Court case.

Now the rulers come along and say, for the children, for the old folk, for the safety of the police, etc. etc. it is necessary to approve of and make sure that the person who owns a gun is not a criminal.  Therefore we will require them to apply for a permit to exercise their God given fundamental right to bear arms in defense themselves, their family and others.  They have taken a God given fundamental right and converted it into a privilege and are charging a tax for it.  It is no different than the example above with regard to freedom of speech.

In the case of firearms, the rulers have it backwards or as one astute fellow told our county board last Tuesday night, “the government has it upside down.”  I and all my fellow humans have the God given fundamental right without the rulers’ permission to keep and bear arms.  The limitation to exercise my right to keep and bear arms can only be legally and constitutionally “taken” if I were to act irresponsibly in the exercising of my right.  Just as the person who is free to exercise their free speech is limited at the point at which it invades some else’s right to enjoyment of their liberties, my right is limited when I approach the point that I infringe another’s right to enjoyment of their liberties.  In other words if I exercise my right by brandishing my gun to steal another’s property then I have over stepped my natural boundary to exercise my God given fundamental right. 

Now many gun owners in this state are humbly beseeching their rulers for a permit to carry concealed weapons; a permit to do that which they already have a God given fundamental right to do.  Further they are trying to get it passed by offering to take a 40 hour course in which they would have to pass some kind of a test, go through some background check, and give out their private property in the form of their finger prints like a common criminal and their money to take this so called safety course.  It makes me sick!

All holders of a public office, from the public library board to the judges, police, and the big boy rulers in the far away cities are charged with the public trust, and take an oath to defend our constitution from encroachment by enemies foreign and domestic.  Have the big boys failed in the public trust?  What are their enforcers to do?  Somehow I am not concerned about the foreign enemies as much as I am the domestic enemies.  It would seem that the rulers are not concerned about foreign enemies either.  They “‘holler’ foreign terrorist,” then pass a bunch of stupid domestic laws to watch you and me.  They won’t even put up a simple fence to keep the ‘terrorists’ out.  They don’t even want me to carry a gun to protect myself and my family against terrorist boogey men.  The rulers do want to track every financial transaction, every bit of health care, and a whole range of inconsequential things, all in the name of security and safety for the children, etal.  I would say that the most secure place in Pike County is our jail, but how many want to live there?  Do you really believe that all this background check and finger printing is just for the safety of the children?  Are people really that naïve? 

I wonder what those traitors to their government (King George), Samuel Adams, James Madison, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and George Washington and rest of our founding fathers who pledged their very lives, fortunes, and sacred honor would say to all us Illinois gun owners, who on our knees before the rulers, are humbly begging, beseeching, and petitioning for a permit law to do that for which many Founders gave all.  Our precious soldiers have poured out or risked their life’s blood to preserve those God given fundamental/inalienable rights.  The next step is licking the rulers’ jack boots to the clinking music of our chains.